Earlier this month, Michael Dunn, the Florida man accused of fatally shooting
17-year-old Jordan Davis, was convicted on 4 of 5 felony charges. The
case, which had garnered national attention, stemmed from an incident
in November 2012 when Dunn – who is white – fired 10 rounds
into an SUV, killing Davis – who was black. The shooting erupted
after a confrontation between Dunn and Davis, who was in a vehicle of
teenagers playing loud music.
Initially, Dunn stated he saw Davis brandish a shotgun and was acting in
self-defense. However, no weapons were found in the SUV and witness testimony
revealed that Dunn had continued firing even though the SUV was retreating.
A Controversial Verdict
On February 15, a Jacksonville jury found Michael Dunn guilty of four of
the five charges he faced, but was unable to reach a decision on the most
serious allegation, the
first-degree murder of Jordan Davis. Dunn was convicted of three counts of attempted second-degree
murder for firing at the three other teenagers in the vehicle, as well
as one count of firing into a vehicle. Dunn's sentencing is set for
late March. He faces up to 75 years in prison.
The case was a significant challenge for both the prosecution and defense,
and many are asking whether this verdict was a victory for either side.
The answer, as Los Angeles criminal defense attorney
Stephen G. Rodriguez states, is not so cut and dry. Attorney Rodriguez gives his thoughts on
what the verdict meant for the prosecution and the defense:
- If this is a victory for the prosecution, it is because Dunn was convicted
on most of the counts (4 of 5) and because it potentially exposes him
to decades in prison – effectively a life sentence for the 47-year-old.
The prosecution will likely retry Dunn on the most serious charge –
murder – and if successful, will add a life sentence of 25 years to life.
- If anything, the defense secured a hollow victory; one in which the defense
hung on the most serious charge of murder. Given the conflicting facts
of the case, the defense did a competent job in presenting their case
and on putting the defendant on the stand, which ultimately convinced
some jurors that he acted in self-defense and was therefore – at
least partially – justified in killing Davis.
The case was heavily followed by media across the country, and raised many
questions about the use of self-defense as a shield for criminal accountability.
Dunn, for instance, stood by his statements that he observed a weapon
in Davis' hands, that verbal threats were made against him, and that
he felt threatened. However, he fired 10 shots into a vehicle of unarmed
teenagers. Although race was not a factor in this case, there were also
certainly racial undertones.
As shown by a hung jury that couldn't reach a decision on the murder
charge, questions about self-defense are not easy to answer. Questions
of whether the verdict was a victory for the prosecution or defense are
also debatable. What's not, however, is the fact that a young man
is now dead.
What Sets Defense Attorneys Apart
At Stephen G. Rodriguez & Partners, our legal team closely follows
controversial cases and analyzes how the prosecution and defense handle
complex allegations and legal issues. What separates talented and successful
defense attorneys from the pack, it often seems, is the willingness to
handle challenging cases, as well as the determination to fight aggressively
and intelligently on behalf of clients. Attorney Stephen G. Rodriguez
has continually demonstrated just that when representing individuals accused
of any crime.
If you or someone you know has been charged with a criminal offense, a
Los Angeles criminal defense lawyer from our firm is prepared to work
tirelessly on your behalf.
Call now to discuss your case.